- WINRUNNER VS QUICK TEST PRO UPDATE
- WINRUNNER VS QUICK TEST PRO DRIVER
- WINRUNNER VS QUICK TEST PRO MANUAL
- WINRUNNER VS QUICK TEST PRO SOFTWARE
- WINRUNNER VS QUICK TEST PRO CODE
Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. "We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help.
WINRUNNER VS QUICK TEST PRO SOFTWARE
They should work to lower the costs for their clients." "There is a lot of room for improvement when it comes to friction-free continuous testing across the software life cycle, as a local installation is required to run UFT." It would improve the user experience if they could create a separate floating panel (or have it automatically show on the side) once the recording starts." "Technical support could be improved." "The price is very high. They could make the recording feature window bigger for whatever activities that I am recording.
Then, the script fails." "The artificial intelligence functionality is applicable only on the web, and it should be expanded to cover non-web applications as well." "We have had some issues with stability, where it crashes sometimes." "UFT has a recording feature.
WINRUNNER VS QUICK TEST PRO CODE
For banking applications, we input formatted text from documents, but the AI feature is recognizing three fields as one field, e.g., for a phone number, it puts all 10 digits in the international code or country code. I wish it was a little more compact." "The AI feature needs improvement. "Sometimes, the results' file size can be intense.
WINRUNNER VS QUICK TEST PRO MANUAL
Looking at the amount of rework and maintenance activity that we had done for our scripts, it might have been a nightmare with some other scripting tool." "The technical support is good, we were satisfied." "The reporting is really nice." "This solution is very easy to learn and any non-programmer or manual tester, with little experience in automation, can pick it up quite easily." "You can quickly build automated testing, manage it, and have it run on a regular basis to ensure that there are no issues."
WINRUNNER VS QUICK TEST PRO UPDATE
It is a good tool that enables me to re-automate my scripts and update my scripts as quickly as possible. Many of my team members shifted over the past one and a half years, and there was no big issue with respect to knowledge sharing. It is also easy in terms of transferring knowledge and skills. No coding skills are required to automate.
WINRUNNER VS QUICK TEST PRO DRIVER
Our data is the number-one important driver for our company, so if that's not good, we have some big problems." "It is easy to maintain and easy to automate. "It can provide all levels of testing from design to execution to reporting." "This tool is very easy to use and I think that anyone can come in, having no experience with it, and within four to six months be comfortable with it." "Tosca BI is important to make sure that our data integrity is in check and validated to make sure our data is good. It helps us to provide early feedback." "The solution has good out-of-the-box protocols." With manual testing, that 15-day timeline meant there were times when we would find defects on the 11th or 12th day of the cycle, but with automation we are able to run the complete suite within a day and we are able to find the failures. It also has dark and light themes." "The production and the efficiency of making your test cases can be very high." "It helps in identifying defects earlier.
It doesn't require that much skill to use and has automatic settings, which is useful for users who don't know what to select. Additionally, upgrades are always provided on a consistent basis." "The interface is fine and there is nothing else to add in terms of enhancement." "Micro Focus UFT One gives us integration capabilities with both API and GUI components. VBScript is very easy to understand and easy to prepare scripts with minimal learning curve." "On a scale of one to ten, I would give Micro Focus UFT One a 10 because it is a reliable product, it works, it's as good or better than similar solutions especially because you get technical support from real people. If you click on that Help button, it directly navigates to the respective help needed. One wouldn’t know the purpose of every option, but there is no need to search because that window contains a Help button. For example, if you are navigating a particular window, where there are different options. "The initial setup is relatively easy." "I like the Help feature in UFT One.
0 kommentar(er)
